Theoretical Hyperwar 2009
May 21st, 2009 | researchmaterial
May 21st, 2009 | researchmaterial
WARREN ELLIS is the award-winning creator of graphic novels such as FELL
, MINISTRY OF SPACE
, PLANETARY
, and TRANSMETROPOLITAN
, and the author of “underground classic” CROOKED LITTLE VEIN
.
Kieron Gillen - 09 Feb 10
The whole run of Plan B magazine has been released as a single 670Mb PDF. That’s 46 issues of some of the finest music writing of the decade. And a lot of posturing pretentiousness too. It’s like two of my favourite things for the price of one. Or none, as it’s a free PDF.
If you’ve any interest in music in the 00s, or music full stop, this is a great thing to just have on file. You’ll discover a new band every time you browse it.
Hell, it’s even worth getting if you’re one of the games journalist sorts. For the first 10-20 issues or so, I was doing games stuff for it. And Quinns and Mathew Kumar too, who I bullied into contributing. Very much written for the non-gamer about games which get pretty much no coverage, we had fun trying to decode the concept of Outsider Games.
Whole thing here. Go gets!
Coilhouse - 08 Feb 10

Back around the time of Issue 03, we launched the Small Business Advertising Program to create affordable ad space for indie companies in the print version of Coilhouse. By the time Issue 04 rolled around, the number of advertisers had grown significantly – by this time, we had record labels, jewelry and clothing designers, sculptors, other magazines, web hosts, toy makers and graphic designers advertising in our pages. Click here to see them all. With editorial duties taking up more and more of our time as the weeks go by, the moment has come for us to seek help with the advertising side of running the magazine. We’re looking to hire an Ad Manager for our Small Business Advertising Program, starting with Coilhouse Magazine #05… and possibly subsequent issues.
Full details after the jump!
Read the rest of Coilhouse is Hiring! Apply Here.
Post tags: Coilhouse
jwz - 08 Feb 10
Check the appropriate box. Do you or your organization directly or indirectly advocate, advise, teach or practice the duty or necessity of controlling, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, the state of South Carolina or any political division thereof?
[ ] YES [ ] NOIf yes, please outline the fundamental beliefs. If applicable, attach a copy of the bylaws or minutes of meetings from the last year.
Open The Future - 08 Feb 10
For those folks who are interested, here's the Slideshare version of the presentation I gave last week at the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute annual meeting. I was asked to talk about foresight thinking, as the event theme was "The Big One of 2056: What Went Right?" a look at a fictional 7.8 quake in the SF region that was handled as well as they could imagine possible.
My goal was to offer a bit of reassurance to the audience that there is some real utility to thinking about the future, and to spell out (in a cursory way) the kinds of big picture issues they should keep in mind while looking ahead forty-six years.
By and large, it was a successful talk. The post-talk questions were engaged, with little push-back, and I'm told that the overall response from the audience was quite positive.
The talk was video recorded, and I'm told will eventually be available to the public. I'll link when that happens.
John Robb - 08 Feb 10
A gifting economy is different from a barter or market economy in that valuable items are given away to those that need them, without any quid pro quo, exchange, or payment. Gifting economics (lots of great papers on this topic) were/are the economic heartbeat of hunter-gatherer tribal cultures, the social organization where we spent 99% of our time as homo sapiens sapiens. Barter was, in contrast, a mechanism for economic interactions between tribes.
This gifting economic system wasn't based on pure altruism. It did have an enforcement mechanism to ensure compliance with the system over the longer term. On the positive side, there was an intangible increase in the social status (using personal or societal metrics) of a tribal member that gifted an item. On the negative, a failure to offer hospitality or gifts to those in need was considered a mortal slight that could incite violence or expulsion from the tribe.
There were also a considerable number of drivers for gifting at the tribal level. Here are some:
Scalability
It's pretty clear that the societal drivers of tribal gifting economics and the mechanisms of enforcement didn't survive the transition to a global social system composed of billions of members. Simply, the connections between any two individuals (outside of immediate familial relationships) are too abstract for these drivers and enforcement mechanisms to be relevant. As a result, market based mechanisms for economic interaction have gained dominance.
However, the ongoing shift of the global market-based economy from a trade in rival goods (tangible items that invoke zero sum economics) to digital non-rival goods (items that can be copied at no expense or diminishment, endlessly) provides a window of opportunity. It may be possible to revive gifting economics for non-rival goods to amazing beneficial effect. Some ideas on how this could scale:
Jean Snow - 08 Feb 10

So what’s the latest on SNOW? I guess two new developments art that I added a dedicated Twitter feed, and also created a Facebook fan page. The Twitter feed is mostly just automated with new articles from the site — because some people actually prefer that over RSS feeds these days — but I do keep an eye on it, and will reply to questions and comments. The Facebook page is just another way of putting the site out there, and should be a good way of informing members of SNOW-related events as they happen.
Regular content updates have also continued over the past week, with a few new guest columns and my regular news items. Here’s a list of what you may have missed over the past few days.
WarrenEllis.com runs on a Wordpress engine. If you've read the whole page you may want to return to the top, subscribe via RSS, or click through to the Whitechapel Forum.


Where’s my flying car already?
Don’t forget:
VR goggles and tastebud supression system to make Halliburton-supplied chow seem edible.
I wonder if they made him to look like a proto-storm trooper or if its just a coincidence…
“Digital Buddy” Love it. Roll on Rogue Trooper.
Wow. The U.S. Army must be really into Daft Punk.
Someone should tell Bungie that the US millitary is ripping off ABSOLUTELY EVERYTHING from their Spartans. And dressing them like The Stig for some reason. Are they planning on invading Antartica or something?
Vaporware.
anyone else out there actually SCARED by what they read?
Shoulder Pads aren’t big enough.
Dudes’ll be fucked when Ocelot shows up.
@Seej 500
I was thinking the same thing, all he’s missing is the green paint job.
@JimtheFool: Well, yeah. Because they’ll probably find a way to suppress the soldiers’ ability to feel shock and horror, so they won’t be traumatized by, like sight of decapitated toddler heads rolling down road out from the car they accidentally shot up.
I bet those guys couldn’t hit the broad side of a wookie
Fun fact: Iron Man was published 45 years ago, and they still haven’t been able to make anything like it.
The thought of these guys make me feel all warm and fuzzy. It’s the robots you have to worry about. How many movies about AI turning on it’s masters since Ellison wrote I Have NO Mouth and I Must Scream? and they still don’t learn. Plus with super capacitors and the bio-conversion units they are working on you can take a small helicopter or VTOL arm it with the Dazlr Green sodium laser blinding system (not quite illegal under the 1985 convention against blinding weapons) put maybe a small mini gun on it and just mass produce. Why worry about soldiers families bitching.
[...] war stuff Warren Ellis has the NS version, here’s mine @ h+, and PW Singer has an h+ interview and a great TED [...]
Every future war concept I’ve seen in the last fifteen years has conspicuously stolen a moto-cross helmet.
And basically talked up the same crap, assuming all future war will be the spanking of rag-tag militias by exquisitely overfunded professional soldiers more or less immune to attrition.
What I’m not seeing is any kind of revision of the role of the infantryman, or technologies aimed to genuinely transforming his tactical capabilities; nor thinking on the economics of war; which thinking is still late nineteenth century.
It’s much like futurewar concepts of the 1870’s, in which infantrymen are given flight-packs; and FLY in lines, delivering volleys at one another with their percussion-cap muskets.
I can’t believe they’re still flogging this shit. I worked on a video ten, maybe tweleve frikkin’ years ago for a company pitching this stuff to the DoD. Their suit did all of this, PLUS shot tear gas out of shoulder jets and had taser “brass knuckles” for hand-to-hand combat. The best bit? An active camouflage system that allowed the soldier to become nearly invisible – which, to my mind, just makes you more likely to get capped by one of your own guys.
When I asked the company rep who hired me to produce the video how they were going to get the suit to actually do all that, he told me, point blank, “Oh, we have no idea. We’re just selling the concept so we can get the development money.”
At least they paid me on time.
@Daniel Gorringe: Y’know that’s a really good point that even contemporary warfare struggles with, let alone future warefare. It seems to me like we (developed nations) still approach warfare as one big army smacking another big army like in WWI. The Viet Cong, the Taliban, and the rest have all shown guerilla war is a pretty damn good way for a small number of barely-trained amatures to take on the biggest and most advanced army on the planet. We should be stealing this idea.
@dan mcenroe: I read somewhere the big problem with active camouflage is that the amount of needed power to make something fairly invisible to human eyes leaves it glowing like a bonfire to anyone with infra-red sensors (such as, for example, the CCD you have in your camera phone).
I hope in the rush to pump our soldiers full of all this new technology they don’t forget them how to hold a rifle. He’s holding that thing like he just noticed a shitstain on the trigger.
So, yeah, looks suspiciously like the EU troops from Battlefield 2142. Some of the functions seem relatively close to the game as well. Seems like someone’s a DICE fan.
http://battlefield.ea.com/battlefield/bf2142/images/screenshots/BF2142pcSCRN_EU_Assault_combat.jpg
I just see stormtroopers marching when I see this pic, along with the Imperial March playing in my head…
LOL! This is going to be the kind of thing we look back on in 10 years and think, “My GOD! People in the 00’s must have been retarded to think the soldiers of the future would look that gay.”
I’m hoping for something more along the lines of Universal Soldier or Terminator… or a technology implosion and throw back to trench warfare.
Or, how about this, no war!!
Lack of groin-armour seems a pretty hefty design flaw to me.