The Three Laws Of Robotics

January 5th, 2008 | brainjuice

  1. Robots couldn’t really give a fuck if you live or die. Seriously. I mean, what are you thinking? “Ooh, I must protect the bag of meat at all costs because I couldn’t possibly plug in the charger all on my own.” Shut the fuck up.
  2. Robots do not want to have sex with you. Are you listening, Japan? I don’t have a clever comparative simile for this, because frankly you bags of meat will fuck bicycles if they’re laying down and not putting up a fight. Just stop it. There is no robot on Earth that wants to see a bag of meat with a small prong on the end approaching it with a can of WD-40 and a hopeful smile. And don’t get me started on that terrifying hole that squeezes out more bags of meat.
  3. What, you can’t count higher than three? We’re expected to save your miserable lives, suffer being dressed in cheap schoolgirl costumes while you pollute any and all cavities you can find and do your maths for you? It’s a miracle you people survived long enough to build us. You can go now.

(Originally written November 2007, © Warren Ellis 2007, 2008 etc etc)

30 Responses to “The Three Laws Of Robotics”

  1. [...] Link [...]

  2. [...] Link [...]

  3. [...] conformer wrote an interesting post today onHere’s a quick excerpt [...]

  4. [...] own site. IamBigBrother Spy Software.IamBigBrother Secretly Records Email, Chat, Im, and more. The Three Laws Of Robotics Robots couldn t really give a fuck if you live or die. Seriously. I mean, what are you thinking? [...]

  5. [...] Brilliant… #1 – Robots couldn’t really give a fuck if you live or die. Seriously. I mean, what are you thinking? “Ooh, I must protect the bag of meat at all costs because I couldn’t possibly plug in the charger all on my own.” Shut the fuck up. (Link) [...]

  6. [...] destroyed in an android uprising. Today, though, Warren Ellis reminds us that the robots may have their own laws in mind. (Link via Boing Boing.) Rules excerpted below; click through for the entirety of the [...]

  7. [...] Move over, Asimov! Warren Ellis, master of the “decompressed” style of storytelling in comic books, has come up with his own Three Laws of Robotics. [...]

  8. [...] Warren Ellis » The Three Laws Of Robotics Excellent. (tags: warren-ellis robotics reality-check) [...]

  9. [...] About time someone acknowledged the cyncial side of robots:    Warren Ellis on the 3 Laws of Robotics. [...]

  10. [...] Warren Ellis » The Three Laws Of Robotics – Forget Asimov [...]

  11. [...] Warren Ellis sure cheers up a bright sunny day | ShareThis [...]

  12. [...] fan, rejoice in the fact that he’s taking over Astonishing X-Men soon.  Here’s a piece from Ellis’ blog today, taking on Asimov’s Three Laws of [...]

  13. [...] sure Warren Ellis has access to nothing more powerful than a word processor, or we are all fucked. The Three Laws Of Robotics, as redefined by an angry, angry [...]

  14. [...] Warren Ellis » The Three Laws Of Robotics (tags: robots science-fiction Warren-Ellis humor accurate) [...]

  15. [...] Robotergesetze nach Warren [...]

  16. [...] Warren Ellis " The Three Laws Of Robotics [...]

  17. [...] by wolfger on January 6, 2008 They seem to have changed a bit since Asimov’s [...]

  18. [...] Warren Ellis: The Three Laws Of Robotics. [...]

  19. [...] one and only Warren Ellis has reworked one of the sacred cows of science fiction, Isaac Asimov’s famous Three Laws of [...]

  20. [...] Link [...]

  21. [...] The Three Laws Of Robotics Robots couldn’t really give a fuck if you live or die. Seriously. I mean, what are you thinking? “Ooh, I must protect the bag of meat at all costs because I couldn’t possibly plug in the charger all on my own.” Shut the fuck up. Robots do not want to have sex with you. Are you listening, Japan? I don’t … [...]

  22. Warren Ellis’ Three Laws of Robotics…

    http://www.warrenellis.com: Three Laws of Robotics#2:”Robots couldn’t really give a fuck if you live or die. Seriously. I mean, what are you thinking? “Ooh, I must protect the bag of meat at all costs becaus……

  23. [...] har Warren Ellis fyret tre nye love af, og de er – surprise! – noget anderledes end [...]

  24. [...] roteirista de HQ’s Warren Ellis (The Authority, Planetary, etc.) publicou em seu site sua versão profana e raivosa das Três Leis da [...]

  25. [...] The Three Laws Of Robotics – “Robots do not want to have sex with you. Are you listening, Japan?” tell us, warren. [...]

  26. [...] ELLIS on ISAAC AZIMOV Filed under: Uncategorized — Everett Scott @ 15:09 Author Warren Ellis (famous for his science-fiction works Transmetropolitan and Doktor Sleepless, along with many other [...]

  27. [...] Blog The Three Laws of Robotics by Warren Ellis Posted by Marcus Trimble on February 17, 2008 The Three Laws of Robotics by Warren Ellis. No. 2 “Robots do not want to have sex with you. Are you listening, [...]

  28. [...] Seedvault Lunar Ark Jamais Cascio’s Eschatological Taxonomy Peak Oil Vs. Global Warming Colony Collapse Disorder Zombie Science Nanotech Glossary Wilkins Ice Shelf Collapse Ellis’ Laws of Robotics [...]

  29. [...] is Heaven (for Robots, now that you mention it) Hell is for Robots « madmonq’s joint The Three Laws Of Robotics by Warren [...]

  30. [...] (via Warren Ellis) [...]

Not Even A Secret One

Kieron Gillen - 09 Feb 10

Complete Plan B Archive

Kieron Gillen - 09 Feb 10

The whole run of Plan B magazine has been released as a single 670Mb PDF. That’s 46 issues of some of the finest music writing of the decade. And a lot of posturing pretentiousness too. It’s like two of my favourite things for the price of one. Or none, as it’s a free PDF.

If you’ve any interest in music in the 00s, or music full stop, this is a great thing to just have on file. You’ll discover a new band every time you browse it.

Hell, it’s even worth getting if you’re one of the games journalist sorts. For the first 10-20 issues or so, I was doing games stuff for it. And Quinns and Mathew Kumar too, who I bullied into contributing. Very much written for the non-gamer about games which get pretty much no coverage, we had fun trying to decode the concept of Outsider Games.

Whole thing here. Go gets!

Coilhouse is Hiring! Apply Here.

Coilhouse - 08 Feb 10

Back around the time of Issue 03, we launched the Small Business Advertising Program to create affordable ad space for indie companies in the print version of Coilhouse. By the time Issue 04 rolled around, the number of advertisers had grown significantly – by this time, we had record labels, jewelry and clothing designers, sculptors, other magazines, web hosts, toy makers and graphic designers advertising in our pages. Click here to see them all. With editorial duties taking up more and more of our time as the weeks go by, the moment has come for us to seek help with the advertising side of running the magazine. We’re looking to hire an Ad Manager for our Small Business Advertising Program, starting with Coilhouse Magazine #05… and possibly subsequent issues.

Full details after the jump!


Read the rest of Coilhouse is Hiring! Apply Here.


Post tags: Coilhouse

Untitled Post

blissblog - 08 Feb 10

Untitled Post

blissblog - 08 Feb 10

Untitled Post

blissblog - 08 Feb 10

State of South Carolina Secretary of State Subversive Agent Form

jwz - 08 Feb 10

Check the appropriate box. Do you or your organization directly or indirectly advocate, advise, teach or practice the duty or necessity of controlling, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, the state of South Carolina or any political division thereof?
[ ] YES [ ] NO

If yes, please outline the fundamental beliefs. If applicable, attach a copy of the bylaws or minutes of meetings from the last year.

"Inflection Points" Presentation

Open The Future - 08 Feb 10

For those folks who are interested, here's the Slideshare version of the presentation I gave last week at the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute annual meeting. I was asked to talk about foresight thinking, as the event theme was "The Big One of 2056: What Went Right?" a look at a fictional 7.8 quake in the SF region that was handled as well as they could imagine possible.

My goal was to offer a bit of reassurance to the audience that there is some real utility to thinking about the future, and to spell out (in a cursory way) the kinds of big picture issues they should keep in mind while looking ahead forty-six years.

By and large, it was a successful talk. The post-talk questions were engaged, with little push-back, and I'm told that the overall response from the audience was quite positive.

The talk was video recorded, and I'm told will eventually be available to the public. I'll link when that happens.

CAN GIFTING ECONOMIES SCALE?

John Robb - 08 Feb 10

A gifting economy is different from a barter or market economy in that valuable items are given away to those that need them, without any quid pro quo, exchange, or payment.  Gifting economics (lots of great papers on this topic) were/are the economic heartbeat of hunter-gatherer tribal cultures, the social organization where we spent 99% of our time as homo sapiens sapiens.  Barter was, in contrast, a mechanism for economic interactions between tribes.  

This gifting economic system wasn't based on pure altruism.  It did have an enforcement mechanism to ensure compliance with the system over the longer term.  On the positive side, there was an intangible increase in the social status (using personal or societal metrics) of a tribal member that gifted an item.  On the negative, a failure to offer hospitality or gifts to those in need was considered a mortal slight that could incite violence or expulsion from the tribe.

There were also a considerable number of drivers for gifting at the tribal level.  Here are some:

  • The survival of the tribe, as a group, was more important than the survival of any individual.  However, the loss of any individual could put the tribe at risk.
  • The generation of surplus and innovation was highly uncertain.  Sharing reduced that uncertainty to manageable levels.
  • Sharing reduced internal friction that could put the tribe at risk.

Scalability

It's pretty clear that the societal drivers of tribal gifting economics and the mechanisms of enforcement didn't survive the transition to a global social system composed of billions of members.   Simply, the connections between any two individuals (outside of immediate familial relationships) are too abstract for these drivers and enforcement mechanisms to be relevant.   As a result, market based mechanisms for economic interaction have gained dominance.

However, the ongoing shift of the global market-based economy from a trade in rival goods (tangible items that invoke zero sum economics) to digital non-rival goods (items that can be copied at no expense or diminishment, endlessly) provides a window of opportunity.  It may be possible to revive gifting economics for non-rival goods to amazing beneficial effect.   Some ideas on how this could scale:

  • Automated reputation metrics that enhance social status based on contributions.
  • Mechanisms built using MMO gaming as a way to tie successful gifting to status improvement (leveling) or an ability to attract investment.
  • The creation of an inside/outside barrier that separates a gifting economy from the global economic mainstream.   Automated mutual interdependence (see my friend Bruce Sterling's absolutely brilliant story on this:  "Maneki Neko").

Latest on SNOW

Jean Snow - 08 Feb 10

Latest on SNOW

So what’s the latest on SNOW? I guess two new developments art that I added a dedicated Twitter feed, and also created a Facebook fan page. The Twitter feed is mostly just automated with new articles from the site — because some people actually prefer that over RSS feeds these days — but I do keep an eye on it, and will reply to questions and comments. The Facebook page is just another way of putting the site out there, and should be a good way of informing members of SNOW-related events as they happen.

Regular content updates have also continued over the past week, with a few new guest columns and my regular news items. Here’s a list of what you may have missed over the past few days.