Apple Files Patent On Evil

November 15th, 2009 | researchmaterial

Apple has filed for patent on a technology they call an "enforcement routine," that’ll display ads on pretty much any device with a screen and demand that you view them — or else you don’t get your device back:

Its distinctive feature is a design that doesn’t simply invite a user to pay attention to an ad — it also compels attention. The technology can freeze the device until the user clicks a button or answers a test question to demonstrate that he or she has dutifully noticed the commercial message. Because this technology would be embedded in the innermost core of the device, the ads could appear on the screen at any time, no matter what one is doing.

17 Responses to “Apple Files Patent On Evil”

  1. Apple’s been evil for a long long time, but they still pretend to be the trendy underdog.

  2. That better not happen on a device/app I’m already paying for, or I’m out the door… Free, well, you get what you pay for. I wouldn’t kill someone if that happened in a free app I’d downloaded…

  3. I would never advocate the assistance of criminal programmers or any activity that would violate a law, but this seems like the kind of thing the greater hacking community could knock out in about two hours.

    This just seems like the next generation of pop up ads. While evil, it isn’t exactly genocide, as far as we know.

  4. I hope this happens to all their devices. Every iPhone, iPod, Macbook, whatever. I want to see the fallout from this. ^_^

  5. Maybe, um, someone at Apple is altruistic, and the company has filed this patent to *prevent* this horror from ever being visited on the world.

    Um, also, maybe Unicorns will bring me whisky and cigars while I sleep.

  6. I’m thrilled by this patent. I want it to succeed and be rigorously enforced. Apple can send their notorious legal department after anyone who infringes, and I can be assured that I never come into contact with it. This is a great thing.

  7. i wish i could say that i am surprised.

  8. Well I .was. considering using an iPhone as the hardware beneath a wearable computer.. ads in my eyes while driving or cycling? Nope.

  9. Microsoft already have the technology, and deployed it in Windows Vista.

    Remember that? The OS that was built with Content Providers in mind, rather than mere customers, and would shut down if you ever, ever tried to play anything that looked like Microsoft’s Best New Friends might own a copyright to it?

    Or maybe… Microsoft OS updates that force a reboot unless you click ‘later’ *and click again the next time you’re asked*? They’re just great when you’re watching a movie, or doing an overnight calculation.

    Nevertheless, I wish Apple the best of luck in this endeavour: any company that deploys this ‘technology’ deserves to go under and probably will. If they’re dumb, they’ll use it themselves; if they’re smart, they’ll license it to Nokia, Sony-Ericcson and Research In Motion.

  10. People seem to forget how unpleasent Apple has been historically when it’s had the upper hand. They’ve made Microsofts worst excesses seem gentle hugs. It’s only been their tiny market share that’s kept them in check.

  11. If they’re shiny, insanely great ads, I fail to see the problem.

  12. Look, any idiot can see that a company who tried to foist this on their regular users would crash and burn horribly. Apple aren’t idiots. Regardless of what any of you may think about their computers or their marketing tactics, you have to admit that much.

    If this patent isn’t simply to prevent any other company from using the idea, the only way we’ll see this in the wild is to subsidize unusually cheap computers and iPhones in order to increase Apple’s marketshare. There’s a lot of people who’d put up with watching a commercial once an hour or so if it got them a Macbook for $200.

  13. […] Warren Ellis » Apple Files Patent On Evil http://bit.ly/2nOq3V […]

  14. Step 1. “Buy” Apple product for free with promise of watching ads
    Step 2. Download a goddamn workaround. It’s gonna take about a week for the code monkeys to churn out a program that sends false positives to the attention tests.
    Step 3. ???
    Step 4. Free computer!

  15. […] Apple Files Patent On EvilNovember 15, 2009 […]

  16. I’ve been long aware that apples are evil…

    http://lavatoryreader.typepad.com/the-lavatory-reader/2009/10/the-danger-of-eating-apples.html

  17. Maybe by getting a patent they can prevent any other hardware maker in the future from implementing anything that does something like this. Apple would never have to actually implement it themselves. Maybe that’s what’s happening. Maybe.


Leave a Reply

claytoncubitt: Will Blanche, ?The Newly Constructed Towers of...

Brian Wood - 20 Nov 09



claytoncubitt:

Will Blanche, ?The Newly Constructed Towers of the World Trade Center Seen From the South Side on West Street, May, 1973? (via These Americans)

See also: Mitch Epstein, ?West Side Highway, New York City? [looking towards World Trade Center] 1977

Percy Jackson trailer

Kung Fu Monkey - 20 Nov 09

Seriously, if I were 12, this would have melted my brain. I love this trailer.

JOURNAL: How to Break and Open Source Insurgency

John Robb - 20 Nov 09

Short Answer:  divide it.

It's long been my contention that Iraq was stabilized at an acceptable level of controlled chaos due to a happy accident by al Qaeda (in an attempt to expand/lead the loose insurgency in a new direction).  What did they do?   They blew up the Golden Mosque in Samara in 2006.  This act of symbolic terrorism did indeed disrupt social networks as anticipated, however the consequences were ultimately disastrous for the Iraqi open source insurgency.  

Baghdad_Ethnic_2007_late_smThe reason for this is it broke the dynamics of the open source insurgency in ways the US and Iraqi government's COIN efforts could not.  First, it created a permanent split between Sunni and Shiite insurgent groups/militias.  Coopetition ended.  Second, it motivated large Shiite militias to start an ethnic cleansing of Sunni areas.  This put acute pressure on Sunni guerrilla groups who were too small (by design to avoid US counter-pressure) to defend themselves against large militias operating in the open.  The result was an opening, very close to the one I described in my 2005 NYTimes OpEd, that allowed the US to convert Sunni guerrilla groups into militias that were not loyal to the central government (in direct contradiction to its COIN manual).   

It's a nice example of the dynamics of many to many conflict, social network disruption, and the development open source counterinsurgency.

See this excellent description at the blog, "Musings on Iraq" for more detail on the ethnic cleansing operations.  It also includes this money quote: "the majority of the Sunni insurgency gave up and switched sides to align with the Americans rather than face annihilation at the hands of the Shiite militias, Al Qaeda in Iraq, or the United States."

NOTE:  it's pretty clear from the above that social network disruption (either through attacks on symbolic targets or blood and guts terrorism) is like playing horseshoes with live hand grenades.  It's ultimately a losing strategy for advancing an open source insurgency.  Social network disruption is very likely to break standing order 6:  don't fork the insurgency.

Twitter Updates for 2009-11-20

Girl Farts - 20 Nov 09

LINKS: 20 NOV 09

John Robb - 20 Nov 09

Some random items of interest:

  • Vigilante militias in Rio are displacing the drug gangs -- favelas under the control of militias has grown from 108 in 2005 to 400 in 2008 (out of 965).  Why?  They have a better (albeit parasitic) conflict/business model than the drug gangs since they act as a substitute for missing public goods/services normally supplied by the government.  First, they provide a minimal level of security and conflict adjudication.  Second, they make more money than the drug gangs by "taxing" everything from propane to cable TV to the gray market.  
  • US gray economy estimated at $1 Trillion (not including criminal, outside of the evasion of taxes and regulation, activities) and growing faster than the "legal" economy.  
  • Proposal and wiki for an open source fabrication lab.
  • Somali pirates are expanding operations into the Indian ocean.  The combination of positive feedback loops (maritime insurance + rapid payoffs by crisis negotiators) and legal ambiguity (the biggest fear of a western navy and governments is that they might arrest a pirate -- prompting a massive/expensive legal tussle with few certain penalties and the forced extension of a visa to the former pirate once he is released from his short incarceration).  Is a franchise model for other locales possible?
  • Yes-we-can-secede
  • A business group in Ciudad Juarez asks for UN peacekeepers.  Hilarious. "Ciudad Juarez, population 1.5 million, has an average of seven homicides a day, with the total at 1,986 for this year through mid-October."
  • Seccession.net.  County based secession effort.  

Untitled Post

blissblog - 20 Nov 09

Yume no Byouin Project

Jean Snow - 20 Nov 09

Yume no Byouin Project

Beautiful (and simple) site design featuring the illustrative work of Yorifuji Bunpei. Via Paul Baron.

Kodai

Jean Snow - 20 Nov 09

Kodai

Coming up at the Kakitsubata gallery in Nakameguro is the show “Kodai,” running from November 25 until December 6.

Kodai

Kap Bambino

jwz - 20 Nov 09

DO NOT WANT. Crunchy, though.

jwz - 19 Nov 09