DOCTOR WHO 3.01

April 2nd, 2007 | brainjuice

I think there’s a sense in the production that David Tennant isn’t as “heavyweight” as Christopher Eccleston, and so consequently nothing written for Tennant really has the weight or shadow of the first-season stuff. Tennant’s Doctor is, however, becoming ever more eccentric, if not just outright batshit — Tennant with his shoes off, crooning “barefoot on the moooon” to himself — which, panto excesses aside, just about kept me interested in this humorous opening episode about an elderly female vampire armed with a drinking straw. Pure children’s television. Lili liked it.

It’s already fallen into rote, of course — the new assistant (or, as the production staff would have it in the behind-the-scenes followup programme, “Doctor Who girl”) has her own Wacky Family who will doubtless bore our tits off over the next two years like the last one did, and this year’s Famous Historical Personality episode is up next. But, you know, it’s a kid’s show, and kids like repetition.

21 Responses to “DOCTOR WHO 3.01”

  1. C’mon, you’ve gotta love Camille Coduri! She’d have been a better companion than Billie.

  2. I agree with the writers not really providing David Tennant any serious material to work with. Which is sad, because from what I’ve seen, actors who do comedy really well (like David) more often than not also do serious and dark really well. Get over it, writers. Eccleston’s on Heroes now and he’s not coming back! Let. It. Go.

  3. I just want to see John Simm’s “Saxon” making evil faces at Tennant as soon as possible.

  4. Jeebus thanks for posting this–hadn’t realized they were airing it already. Downloading ep 3.01 now ; )

  5. he’s an immortal time traveling scientist, what more do you want? if it’s pathos your looking for i direct your attention to anything that isn’t zany sci-fi antics… or politics…

  6. You missed the Eccleston season, then.

    (and, you know, any number of other seasons with other Doctors, but whatever.)

  7. I’ve been really liking Tennant, moreso than Eccleston personally. There have been little twinges of the Eccleston dark and moody last season, but I’m blanking on specific examples, and I think he can pull it off if they give it to him.

  8. Both seasons had their hits and their misses, I feel that this season is shaping up nicely though, from what I’ve heard. But I just bear in mind that I thought the opening episodes from both seasons were weak, followed by occasional stand alone eps of genius. If that’s what we get repeated, I’ll be happy.

  9. Really Chris’ Survivor guilt was what made the first series for me.

    I’d like to see Tenant be something other than “the wacky one”.

    -SH.

  10. I enjoyed the new one, as Charlie Brooker said in Saturday’s screenburn; it bucked the trend of the opening episodes by being a damn sight stronger.

    The introduction of the new assistant was well handled, it’s hard to extrapolate from one episode but her performance seems to be different enough from Piper’s to keep my interest. However, I’ve still got this nagging feeling that the prominence given to Rose and her character development might end up overshadowing, or even worse creating a template for, any future assistant. I can’t remember another assistant whose character was treated in the same way as Rose’s. It was one of the story beats that made the new stuff stand out from the ‘classic’ series. This isn’t based on Agyeman’s performance, more on my misgivings about RTD’s writing.

    There were a few nice little touches, the mention of her cousin in Canary Wharf, The Doctor mouthing along when she said “It’s bigger on the inside”. The little things made the episode for me.

    His mention of a brother brought up a plot point that I’d heard was going to be used during the Pertwee run. If it means that who I think is coming back is definitely on the horizon than I can’t wait and I’d be happy to see either John Simm or Derek Jacobi play him.

    J

  11. So far, I personally prefer Tennant. Eccleston was almost too dark and serious. It got overbearing. Perhaps Tennant goes the other direction.

    And Martha bothers me so far because she’s just too accepting and “okay” with everything. The way the previews implied it, I thought she was going to be extremely skeptical and… scientific. Looks like it’s just the opposite.

  12. It’d have to be the Master this season. Who else is left after all? The Sontarians? The Ice Warriors? The freaking Mad Monk?

    As long as it’s not sodding Daleks again.

  13. I didn’t belive the designers on Dr Who Confidential when they explained the long design process for the Judoon, though. I reckon he just told them “Make them look like Sontarans, but with different heads.”

    And was it just me or did that episode and a lot of the teaser trailer afterwards suggest that somebody in the Who production team is a wee bit fond of “The Fifth Element”?

  14. Sontarans always made me really uncomfortable. Because they couldn’t move their heads. The idea made me incredibly uncomfortable.

  15. It used to be I could get the latest Who in a few hours via eDonkey 2000. But those shits at the MPAA/RIAA killed it. Now it takes forever to get anything via eMule. Torrent?! Mine’s Dribble!

  16. “The way the previews implied it, I thought she was going to be extremely skeptical and… scientific. Looks like it’s just the opposite.”

    She’s been taken to the moon and met space rhinos, a man made entirely of leather and a vampire. Next week she’s travelling in a time machine that’s bigger on the inside than the outside to meet Shakespeare. How on Earth do you maintain a skeptical outlook in the face of that?

  17. Ah, YouTube to the rescue. With a good plugin, I can get the entire episode within minutes! Not as good as eD2k, but good enough to watch NOW.

  18. Looking forward to seeing this – though I wasn’t thrilled with series 2. I liked Sontarans, and although I saw them in the trailer, I’m sick of emo Daleks, too. And the Master would be pretty cool!!

  19. [...] keep your critical faculties about you as you enthuse, though. I don’t 100% agree with Warren Ellis that: It’s already fallen into rote, of course — the new assistant (or, as the production staff [...]

  20. [...] keep your critical faculties about you as you enthuse, though. I don’t 100% agree with Warren Ellis that: It’s already fallen into rote, of course — the new assistant (or, as the production staff [...]

  21. [...] keep your critical faculties about you as you enthuse, though. I don’t 100% agree with Warren Ellis that: It’s already fallen into rote, of course — the new assistant (or, as the production staff [...]

Not Even A Secret One

Kieron Gillen - 09 Feb 10

Complete Plan B Archive

Kieron Gillen - 09 Feb 10

The whole run of Plan B magazine has been released as a single 670Mb PDF. That’s 46 issues of some of the finest music writing of the decade. And a lot of posturing pretentiousness too. It’s like two of my favourite things for the price of one. Or none, as it’s a free PDF.

If you’ve any interest in music in the 00s, or music full stop, this is a great thing to just have on file. You’ll discover a new band every time you browse it.

Hell, it’s even worth getting if you’re one of the games journalist sorts. For the first 10-20 issues or so, I was doing games stuff for it. And Quinns and Mathew Kumar too, who I bullied into contributing. Very much written for the non-gamer about games which get pretty much no coverage, we had fun trying to decode the concept of Outsider Games.

Whole thing here. Go gets!

Coilhouse is Hiring! Apply Here.

Coilhouse - 08 Feb 10

Back around the time of Issue 03, we launched the Small Business Advertising Program to create affordable ad space for indie companies in the print version of Coilhouse. By the time Issue 04 rolled around, the number of advertisers had grown significantly – by this time, we had record labels, jewelry and clothing designers, sculptors, other magazines, web hosts, toy makers and graphic designers advertising in our pages. Click here to see them all. With editorial duties taking up more and more of our time as the weeks go by, the moment has come for us to seek help with the advertising side of running the magazine. We’re looking to hire an Ad Manager for our Small Business Advertising Program, starting with Coilhouse Magazine #05… and possibly subsequent issues.

Full details after the jump!


Read the rest of Coilhouse is Hiring! Apply Here.


Post tags: Coilhouse

Untitled Post

blissblog - 08 Feb 10

Untitled Post

blissblog - 08 Feb 10

Untitled Post

blissblog - 08 Feb 10

State of South Carolina Secretary of State Subversive Agent Form

jwz - 08 Feb 10

Check the appropriate box. Do you or your organization directly or indirectly advocate, advise, teach or practice the duty or necessity of controlling, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, the state of South Carolina or any political division thereof?
[ ] YES [ ] NO

If yes, please outline the fundamental beliefs. If applicable, attach a copy of the bylaws or minutes of meetings from the last year.

"Inflection Points" Presentation

Open The Future - 08 Feb 10

For those folks who are interested, here's the Slideshare version of the presentation I gave last week at the Earthquake Engineering Research Institute annual meeting. I was asked to talk about foresight thinking, as the event theme was "The Big One of 2056: What Went Right?" a look at a fictional 7.8 quake in the SF region that was handled as well as they could imagine possible.

My goal was to offer a bit of reassurance to the audience that there is some real utility to thinking about the future, and to spell out (in a cursory way) the kinds of big picture issues they should keep in mind while looking ahead forty-six years.

By and large, it was a successful talk. The post-talk questions were engaged, with little push-back, and I'm told that the overall response from the audience was quite positive.

The talk was video recorded, and I'm told will eventually be available to the public. I'll link when that happens.

CAN GIFTING ECONOMIES SCALE?

John Robb - 08 Feb 10

A gifting economy is different from a barter or market economy in that valuable items are given away to those that need them, without any quid pro quo, exchange, or payment.  Gifting economics (lots of great papers on this topic) were/are the economic heartbeat of hunter-gatherer tribal cultures, the social organization where we spent 99% of our time as homo sapiens sapiens.  Barter was, in contrast, a mechanism for economic interactions between tribes.  

This gifting economic system wasn't based on pure altruism.  It did have an enforcement mechanism to ensure compliance with the system over the longer term.  On the positive side, there was an intangible increase in the social status (using personal or societal metrics) of a tribal member that gifted an item.  On the negative, a failure to offer hospitality or gifts to those in need was considered a mortal slight that could incite violence or expulsion from the tribe.

There were also a considerable number of drivers for gifting at the tribal level.  Here are some:

  • The survival of the tribe, as a group, was more important than the survival of any individual.  However, the loss of any individual could put the tribe at risk.
  • The generation of surplus and innovation was highly uncertain.  Sharing reduced that uncertainty to manageable levels.
  • Sharing reduced internal friction that could put the tribe at risk.

Scalability

It's pretty clear that the societal drivers of tribal gifting economics and the mechanisms of enforcement didn't survive the transition to a global social system composed of billions of members.   Simply, the connections between any two individuals (outside of immediate familial relationships) are too abstract for these drivers and enforcement mechanisms to be relevant.   As a result, market based mechanisms for economic interaction have gained dominance.

However, the ongoing shift of the global market-based economy from a trade in rival goods (tangible items that invoke zero sum economics) to digital non-rival goods (items that can be copied at no expense or diminishment, endlessly) provides a window of opportunity.  It may be possible to revive gifting economics for non-rival goods to amazing beneficial effect.   Some ideas on how this could scale:

  • Automated reputation metrics that enhance social status based on contributions.
  • Mechanisms built using MMO gaming as a way to tie successful gifting to status improvement (leveling) or an ability to attract investment.
  • The creation of an inside/outside barrier that separates a gifting economy from the global economic mainstream.   Automated mutual interdependence (see my friend Bruce Sterling's absolutely brilliant story on this:  "Maneki Neko").

Latest on SNOW

Jean Snow - 08 Feb 10

Latest on SNOW

So what’s the latest on SNOW? I guess two new developments art that I added a dedicated Twitter feed, and also created a Facebook fan page. The Twitter feed is mostly just automated with new articles from the site — because some people actually prefer that over RSS feeds these days — but I do keep an eye on it, and will reply to questions and comments. The Facebook page is just another way of putting the site out there, and should be a good way of informing members of SNOW-related events as they happen.

Regular content updates have also continued over the past week, with a few new guest columns and my regular news items. Here’s a list of what you may have missed over the past few days.