Brighton I Am In You Etc

September 5th, 2012 | daybook

I am ensconced in a Brighton hotel, for tomorrow I give a talk that I finally cobbled together at 2 o’clock this morning.

I am reliably informed that I will have Small News next Monday, and probably again a few weeks after that, and then probably again a few weeks after that. I feel like I’m constantly operating under stealth these days.

Oh: I am confirmed as a speaker at the Secular Europe Campaign Rally in London on September 15th. I’m speaking after Peter Tatchell, I think. Which is a little weird for me. As weird as keynoting an event that has the likes of Regine Debatty, Rebekka Kill and Anab Jain as speakers, which is what is happening tomorrow. The old career’s gone a bit strange in the last few years, hasn’t it?

(You should google those names if you don’t know them, by the way. I’d do it for you but I’m on an iPad on hotel wifi.)

And now I need to write some of New Book before dinner.


Coughing On Reality

September 3rd, 2012 | daybook

I am currently charging up All The Things, because Wednesday I travel to Brighton to give the morning keynote at Improving Reality on Thursday.  Honor Harger very kindly and sweetly pinned me to the wall to decide what I was going to talk about, and the answer is a bit like this:

Warren will speak about the underpinning of Improving Reality in a talk entitled “How To See The Future.”  Atemporality and retromania, JG Ballard’s “boring future” and “manufactured normalcy” all tend to mitigate against Improving Reality, because they tell us whatever we do will be kind of dull in the end.  Warren finds this uninteresting, and instead would rather hold a seance for the future and launch the room into The Science Fiction Condition.

I obviously reserve the right to ignore all this and just fling handfuls of my own lung tissue at the audience while screeching about being forced to get out of bed before noon.

I believe they’re videoing the entire event, and I’ll post the full text of my bit when I get home.

Very much hoping to get a pint with Lauren Beukes, Professor Elemental, Kemper Norton, Joe Stannard, Petra Davis and other luminaries.

Waiting on some press releases to pop.  Forwards!


Stops And Starts

September 1st, 2012 | daybook

Okay, I’m back again. This week got eaten up by writing and dealmaking, and various bits of news should start to pop from next week. Going to try getting a SPEKTRMODULE done this weekend, and getting back into the general flow of things Monday/Tuesday. It’s been a really strange summer. (And I don’t mean the weather, because we didn’t actually get a summer here.)

Of course, I SAY I’m getting back into the flow, but I’m on a train to Brighton on Wednesday, so we’ll see…!


Vintage Space

August 27th, 2012 | daybook

Writing my talk for Improving Reality, the Brighton (UK) event I’m speaking at on September 6.

 [details]

And I’m looking at this phrase I noted down Saturday night.  “Vintage space.”  Or “vintage space travel,” in a clearer but less economical (or, somehow, pretty/doomy) turn.

Google tells me it’s not a new term.  First hit was Amy Shira Teitel’s blog.

It is, to me, an incredibly grim term, one I wish I’d had to hand when I wrote the foreword to ORBITER.

[amazon] [amazon uk]

Saturday night, of course, Neil Armstrong died. Soon – it is horrible to note – Buzz Aldrin and Michael Collins will be gone, too, and the last of the vast team that put them on the Moon with 1969 technology.  A period that recently entered the realm of “antique.”  Hell, I think a car from 1975 now counts as vintage. In a few more generations, the likes of me will be gone, too, and there will be no-one on Earth who remembers what it’s like to have lived in a time when humans walked on the Moon.

Vintage space.  I’ll be damned.


Lucy

August 18th, 2012 | daybook

 

Haven’t been around too much for the last week. Today was the last day of Lucretia Borgia Ellis, more commonly known for the last eighteen years as: Lucy, Satanic moggy, Ugliest Kitten Ever Seriously Who Knew Kittens Could Even Be Ugly, destructive furbag, friend and motherly companion of Lili, good girl.  After a fairly grim week, I had to take care of her today, and found a sunbeam to lay her down in, as she prefers.


Closing

August 13th, 2012 | daybook

I was going to complete a SPEKTRMODULE podcast tonight, but, after having watched the Olympic closing ceremony with Lili, I’m no longer in the mood.  It’s a silly, pointless thing to get angry about.  But, by the time it finally finished, I found myself weirdly furious.  I was somehow under the impression that it was to be an event about British musical culture.  And what it turned out to be was a flabby, lazy variety show notable for 1) preponderance of old white people 2) famous people who apparently didn’t want to turn up 3) no sense at all of British musical culture.

Don’t get me wrong, it was lovely to see Ray Davies and all that.  But anyone who watches that show looking for an understanding of how we do and did music here is going to come away with some very bad ideas.  I get that these things are difficult to put on, but it was my presumption that one hires the people who know how to do it.

The opening ceremony pointed to the future.  The closing ceremony – with a stated mandate of “A Symphony Of British Music” – ended with The Who.  It was like drawing a line under Britain.  All over.  “A Symphony Of British Music” is something that’s naturally going to catch my attention.  Sadly, it was no such thing.  You can’t just scrape off ten numbers from the top of the Guinness Book Of Records – and whatever the fuck that was that George Michael sang after “Freedom” – and call it Job Done.  Karaoke bars put more effort into the job than that.

It was as conservative, hidebound and bland as the Opening Ceremony was ambitious, demented and eccentric.  It played almost as an attempt to zero out what Danny Boyle and Frank Cottrell Boyce achieved and said in the Opening.

And I remain, for no good reason, sad and angry over this stupid and petty thing, because it sought to tell the world that my odd, bittersweet, green and grey little country is not beautiful and mad in all the ways I have always known it to be.


Well, Yes, And Here We Go Again

August 7th, 2012 | daybook

I finally broke proper ground on New Novel, after a few false starts.  This one’s fighting me, and I imagine it will continue to kick and bite through all projected 80000 words.  (Projected 80000 – I think GUN MACHINE ended up somewhere over 85000.)

This means that this goddamn thing is back for a few months.

DEATH BAR

In which I exercise some thirteen-year-old memories of beautiful Trieste and do a bad George Orwell metaphor that will not survive the second draft.  But when the book’s fighting, the important thing is to keep moving.

The book has a name, but I’m not allowed to say anything about it yet.  So, for a few months, it will simply be Next Novel. 

More news to come soon.  But for now, I simply note that Next Novel is properly begun.


Bah

July 28th, 2012 | daybook

Fell ill Weds night/Thurs morning.  Still ill.  Was invited by BBC Newsnight to watch the Olympic opening ceremony and then comment on it.  Couldn’t get out of bed.  Very sad.  Live-tweeted it instead.  Back Monday.


And We’re Off

July 24th, 2012 | daybook

Attempting to post with an image from the iPad. The iPad WordPress app seems oddly less smart about this than the iPhone one.

Anyway. I broke ground on my end of WASTELANDERS last night. Which was mostly about getting used to Final Draft again, a screenwriting program that I haven’t spent time with in a while. Also, there’s still some comfort to be found on writing on my new laptop, which is one of those widescreen jobs with a chiclet keyboard. I still feel like I’m missing some screen real estate, and the keyboard is a bit odd (and a bit weird in its layout — the Return key is relatively tiny.) It’s the Lenovo IdeaPad Y580 with the i7 chipset, the FHD screen and the SSD memory cache on top of the 2TB HDD, for those who like to know such things. It seems reliable thus far aside from an occasional issue with the pointer — for some reason, new Lenovos and Flash (and perhaps Chrome) don’t play well together. But it’s better than the complete crash I was getting every time I played YouTube videos on the old machine.

I did leer at Joss’ MacBook Air last week, just because it’s so thin and tiny. But that screen would wreck my eyes in the end. I’d previously considered a Zenbook, for the same reasons, but discarded it, for the same reasons. Also, the demonstration machine crashed when I touched it.

And I’ve just realised that this app isn’t going to let me post the goddamn picture. Maybe when I get past this screen? We’ll see.

So, for the next few weeks, I’m in WASTELANDERS and a couple of other projects that won’t get announced until next year. And pacing around the opening of Next Novel, which is still giving me some trouble. And still peering at comics a bit, in the distance, because I can see one or two things I’d like to do in the future, should I ever find amenable artists. But thinking about that is mostly just mental play, the thing you toss around early in the morning or late in the evening to sharpen the edges of your brain on.

Also keeping half an eye on Thrillbent (which, as a title, still sounds to me like an obscure British gay porn magazine from 1980, sorry guys) and Monkeybrain, which both look to become major webcomics portals over the next year. I find it particularly interesting — and honestly a little odd — that Thrillbent’s teamed with Top Cow to present new work from that publisher, but if it injects new money into Thrillbent so that they can do new and more peculiar work in their free-to-air model, that’ll work out fine for me as a reader. Very curious to see what my old mate John Rogers, of LEVERAGE, eventually does in that comics model. I’m still not sold on The Thrillbent Way, but if they can make it a success, I will happily shut up and read comics.

Okay. Back to work.

20120724-150322.jpg


Back From London

July 19th, 2012 | daybook

And I won’t return until after the bloody Olympics.

So, two days of hitting things with hammers, and WASTELANDERS looks solved.  Dinner last night with Natalie Haynes and her man Dan, Anthony Head and his daughter Daisy, Bryan Hitch and some nice man whose name I barely caught because I was leaving as he was coming in, because I was friiiiied.  I was taking two days off to work on WASTELANDERS, but the film, tv and book industries weren’t, so I was operating on an overclocked brain and nowhere near enough sleep.

(Bryan and I talked briefly about his future comics work, for those who follow that: soon he will finally be writing for himself, a thing that is about ten years overdue.)

There was a very funny and sweet moment where Joss and I, pacing around Covent Garden in search of a solution to a hurdle in the fourth act, were stopped by a charming young woman who was literally physically shaking at having recognised Joss.  She was very nice, and kindly indulged us as we pretended not to be staggering around London in search of a plot.  Or even the plot.

So that was that.  And now my city, from whence my forebears emanate, is overrun by pay-cops and the military and the moneysuckers, I shall struggle mightily to avoid it until after the farce in Stratford is over.

I noticed today that the standard digest-size comics page fits quite nicely in the content stream width here.  Not that I can really do anything about that, but it was an interesting thing to me.  I am probably the last comics guy who doesn’t have a problem with scrolling.  You know, since the rest of the fucking internet does it and all.

I have another speaking event coming up in Britain this year, which I’ll give its own post tomorrow.  For now, I’m just going to note that I’m back by the sea, I have some things to do, and I may even add a few more.


The Facebook Cortex

July 17th, 2012 | daybook

Robert Scoble is a well-known internet writer and videomaker whose chief skill appears to be the almost childlike, obsessive early-adoption of new services.  He was bitching for months about not being on Twitter’s suggested-users list because he followed tens of thousands of people, and currently has more than a million people in Google Circles or something.  In a recent post about “scalable living,” he linked to a statement he made on Facebook, of which this is the relevant chunk:

Compare my profiles at https://www.facebook.com/robertscoble to https://profiles.google.com/scobleizer and you’ll see the benefits of frictionless sharing on Facebook. On Facebook you can see a LOT more about me. My Quora questions. My foursquare checkins. My Spotify music. My Pinterest repins. And a lot more.

Google, on the other hand, hates automatic sharing of who you are. I believe this puts Google at a huge strategic disadvantage.

Interesting word, there.  “Benefits.”  He’s told Facebook probably tens of thousands of things about his life and economic activity.  Robert Scoble is, in fact, one of Facebook’s most delightful products.  He’s turned over his short-term memory and the digital wormcast of his waking hours over to a company that sells advertising space on the basis that their products – also know as “their users” and their tracked activities – can be induced to spend money through targeting.

Put another way: there is, in fact, a little bit of Robert Scoble’s brain that is now the Facebook Cortex.

And, through his usual hyperactivity, he’s become an even better product: there are 350,000 people following Scoble on Facebook, clicking Like on his Foursquare checkins and Spotify reports – and by those actions Facebook can compile consumer profiles on each of them, too.  That little chunk of brain that Scoble has turned over to Facebook is helping to make all his readers better products, too.

Scoble’s looking ahead to contextual computing, and the idea that putting all this data into Facebook will eventually make his life easier because other services will be able to extrapolate it into daily-life informational aid.  Because, of course, Facebook is all about you being able to take your data out of it.

Oh, hey, here’s Scoble in 2008, being kicked off Facebook for scraping his contacts data out of his account.

Services, of course, may be able to pay Facebook for the use of Robert Scoble’s Facebook Cortex, and of the products who’ve been pulled into his pseudo-social wake.  Scoble may even wish to pay services to use widgets powered by his own data that the service has paid Facebook to access.

Perhaps there will be tangible benefits (for values of “tangible”) for allowing Facebook to colonise a tiny corner of our brains, in the future.  If we continue to report, we get things.  Amusingly, Bruce Sterling suggested in Eindhoven suggested that something like that could be a condition (or even the condition) of a citizenship that allows you access to basic social services.  Perhaps, once again, Robert Scoble is the canary in the coalmine of social media.

Him and his little blue Facebook Cortex, automatically reporting away in the social dark.

 

 

(Disclosure: yes, I have a small Page on Facebook.  It’s an aggregator.  You know what sort of thing gets posted here.  If someone releases jenkem as a retail product, I’m sure Facebook will be the first to inform my Facebook readers.)


This Week

July 14th, 2012 | daybook

Joss, on Friday at San Diego:

Whedon also said he is going straight from Comic-Con to London to meet with Warren Ellis about another project.

Yes.  This week I am in London, working with Joss on this damn thing again.  You want to know how good a friend I consider him?  I have to be working BEFORE ELEVEN O’CLOCK IN THE MORNING.  I am rarely awake before eleven.  In order to do this I will have to be on a train before ten.  This is tantamount to asking me to chew up an entire sheep and spit out a woollen blanket before I am allowed coffee.

I’m preloading a few pieces in the system, but consider me gone until Thursday.


Around

July 12th, 2012 | daybook

Still here. Took delivery of a new laptop yesterday — the 15-inch Lenovo Ideapad Y580 with the FHD screen and the i7 chip, for those who care — so I should be productive again shortly. Although I’m writing this on the iPad, because I won’t be productive on the Ideapad until the gel tape I ordered from Amazon arrives. Because the Ideapad has sharp edges. On the leading edge, where my wrists sit when I type. Which is why I have red grooves in my wrists, like a very tired cutter armed only with a butter knife, this morning. So I have to put gel tape over the edges. Other than that, it doesn’t seem like a bad machine, the usual Lenovo and Win7 crankiness aside.

The really nice thing, of course, is how quickly I can get a new machine up and running these days. I use a service called Ninite, that creates a loadpoint for new machines — a little executable file that contains the installation commands for the programs I need. Start it up, and it goes off and downloads and installs every program I selected (from a long list on their site). There were, I think, only four things I needed that they didn’t have on their list. And all my work lives in Dropbox. So, within an hour of taking delivery of the machine, I was away, with Chrome and 1Password all synced, iTunes library recompiled and entirely within my preferred setup.

(All I really have to do is puzzle out my Livedrive instance — I have two external drives hooked to Livedrive, but Livedrive won’t recognise them as anything other than new drives, because they’re piping through a laptop with a new name. So I may have to re-upload 35GB of ripped CDs to keep everything straight, which is a little irritating, but still…)

Anyway. No heavy writing until the gel tape arrives, but I’m around, on a machine that won’t (so far) crash if I cough on it.


The British Humanist Association

June 21st, 2012 | daybook

If you click over here, you’ll see a list of the Association’s Distinguished Supporters, and quickly conclude that I have no business being in that company.

The BHA’s goals are fairly simple:

We want a world where everyone lives cooperatively on the basis of shared human values, respect for human rights, and concern for future generations.

We want non-religious people to be confident in living ethical and fulfilling lives on the basis of reason and humanity.

We campaign for a secular state, challenge religious privilege, and promote equal treatment in law and policy of everyone regardless of religion or belief.

These are goals I’m proud to be associated with.  Going forward, this means I may doing a few personal appearances in connection with BHA events, and speaking in my role as a supporter every now and then.

I’m not going to make lots of sales pitches, but if the BHA interests you, they like it if I tell you that you can join.  I believe the perks include the legal rights to behead sorcerers and put false messiahs to the torch, but I may possibly have just made that up.  Also Richard Dawkins will send you a pair of his used underpants.

(I took that photo at Great Brampton House the other week.  The Millers appear fond of their lawn art.  Also I probably made up the bit about underpants too.)

BHA on Twitter: @BHAhumanists


What Is The Legal Status Of The Weather?

June 20th, 2012 | daybook

People often laughingly ask why the English are so preoccupied with the weather.  Elaine Stritch once famously said, “If you don’t like the weather in England, wait a minute.”  If you lived somewhere where it’s been raining for the last nine months or so, you’d have an interest in it.  Also, of course, once every five or six years, it rains for a whole year, and then things get difficult.

This question occurred to me on the way to Under Tomorrow’s Sky in Eindhoven.  Being English, and given the above, the sky is therefore of some interest to me. So much so that it was right at the top of my list.

Yes, my handwriting is terrible.  Also, I was writing that in the back of a car.  Shut up.

In the early Nineties, I had family in Cornwall, and would take the coach to visit them.  Two things to note about the coach ride to Cornwall.  One, there was always a cheer when the coach crossed the county border into Cornwall.  Two, it was a sarcastic cheer, because the rain always started when the coach crossed the county border into Cornwall.  My family lived in a large Cornish town. And I recall once arriving to some chaos, because the rain had been so steady, for so long, that it had finally invaded the telephone network, and killed every phone in a twenty mile radius.  And there were neighbours relying on their phones – this is before the days of the ubiquitous mobile phone, remember – for things like emergency medical services.

We’re not even talking about major Katrina-like events here.  We’re talking about your basic constant shitty weather killing people by subtracted urban support services.

The city can be seen as a machine for living in, and one of its mechanisms is this: if I live in the city, an ambulance is fifteen minutes away, but if I live in the country, it’s fifty minutes away.  Corrections to those numbers, like traffic density and stresses on the health provider, apply to both, but the simple fact is that the hospitals are in the big towns and cities, and the closer you are to the hospitals the better your chances are.

Until the weather drowns the comms system or the land you’re on starts to slip due to a year’s worth of saturation or your town just ends up underwater.

I paraphrased Bruce Sterling’s bit, while I was on my feet at the gig: the cities will be filled with old people who are afraid of the sky.

But I recalled something else.  Since the 1960s, Russia has been guaranteeing good weather for its Red Square parades and state holidays by controlling the weather.  Here in England, in fact, it’s long been held that the Russians have pushed their rain this way.  No-one ever called them on it, of course, because they were entirely capable of sending things larger and harder than rain through the air towards us instead.  Also, obviously, we’re paranoid about rain.

What is the international legality of that?  I mean, if you could exert serious control over weather. Is there a legal framework for saving your cities from destructive weather by pushing that weather somewhere else?  What’s the right of response if you find yourself suddenly deluged by the rainfall that nature had originally aimed at a city that couldn’t take it?  Saving Wales by chucking eight feet of water at Ireland?

What is the legal status of the weather?

Something Rachel Armstrong said at Under Tomorrow’s Sky: Nature wants to smash us.  Until we get out the bleach.  Which I love, but I don’t know whether it’s possible to uncreate weather, what the long-term results of that would be, and if the short-term results simply involve that weather happening to someone else.  Which brings up the big questions should a protocol be evolved to deal with the actual Katrina-level events, which would constitute batting an event with the payload of a small nuclear device over someone else’s fence, with some uncertainty as to whether or not it’s been defused.

Or, worse: knowing it hasn’t been defused.

I have a lot of questions.  They feel like questions that may need answering by a lot of people in the near future.

 

I’m on Twitter as @warrenellis. Rachel Armstrong is at @livingarchitect.  Bruce has a private account at @bruces.


Our Hopeless Future And Other Comedy

June 18th, 2012 | daybook

First off, this happened last Friday evening.

A CRACKED WISDOM TOOTH with a raging infection that resisted antibiotics so handily that it had to be removed on an emergency basis.  The dentist injected about a pint of drugs (including adrenaline) into my face and then said, “Nurse, give me the Cow Horns.”  At which point I decided it would be best to close my eyes.  Thirty minutes of hard manual labour later, the result is pictured.

And yes, I was getting on a plane the next day.  Which I did.

Also, yes, one of the bits does look a bit like a finger.

I have a lot of catching up to do, so I’m resorting to the daybook format for the rest of the week.

BEN HAMMERSLEY, presenting his new book, 64 Things You Need to Know Now for Then: How to Face the Digital Future without Fear.  The moustache is, in fact, embossed.  Much like Ben’s own.  We were on a panel together at the literary/philosophy festival How The Light Gets In a couple of weeks ago, along with the journalist/analyst Edie Lush and the radio journalist Paul Moss.  Ben and I had some fun messing with each other, but he always won the sympathy vote because of his dogs, which slept in his arms the whole time.  People thought this was cute, and did not realise they were merely biding their time until the perfect kill-strike opportunity presented itself.

(a crop of an original photo by Adam Greenfield)

HOW THE LIGHT GETS IN was a really, really interesting weekend for me.  I got to meet all kinds of brilliant people I’d never normally have access to.  And there’s some cognitive dissonance in sitting talking to Michael Nyman about Chingford.  I probably spent the most time talking to Andrew Copson, chief executive of the British Humanist Association (their sister org, the Rationalist Association, publishes The New Humanist, which I never get to read any more because Lili stole my copy so often that I eventually put the subscription in her name when she was 14 or so, making her possibly their youngest reader).

Also, this is the back garden of the place the festival put me up in:

That is in fact a giant iron, yes.

I was billeted at Great Brampton House, a fantastic and maybe a leeetle eccentric place run by some fantastic and maybe a leeetle eccentric people who were just incredibly welcoming to a tired old hack who really had no idea what he was walking into.   (Caitlin Moran was in the car that dropped me off there, and she expressed a curiosity as to whether I would be seen alive again.)  Have a little look inside:

You have no idea how grateful I am to Nancy at the festival, and to the wonderful Millers and their staff, and their drinks cabinet.  The drinks cabinet is where I met Andrew, plying Hilary Rose with martinis.  If it hadn’t been for him drawing everyone into conversation, I probably would have stayed at the table you can see above, hanging on to the whisper of wifi so I could finish writing a tv project outline.  Instead, I got to spend an evening talking with Hilary and Steven Rose.  Which is not an opportunity you get every day, and one that may never come again, just getting to drink and talk with and listen to two eminent and engaged scientists in their seventies.

Despite the horrendous weather, both the above-mentioned panel (about whether the internet was changing the way we think) and my one-on-one panel with the festival organiser, Vassili Christodoulou, was remarkably well attended, the latter fixture’s attendance being something commented on by another staffer.  Even though the rain almost washed me off the board:

OUR HOPELESS FUTURE AND OTHER COMEDY.


Back From Eindhoven

June 17th, 2012 | daybook

The silver FIELD NOTES book gets reserved for the serious business. The whisky was provided, with great kindness, by the estimable Bruce Sterling.

Just got back from Eindhoven a few hours ago, where I was on the public think tank for the science/art brainstorming that will inform the forthcoming UNDER TOMORROW’S SKY exhibition at MU Gallery there, on the subject of the city of the future.  Tomorrow I will try and unpack at least some of what happened there.  But I want to say that Bruce, the cracklingly intelligent biologist Rachel Armstrong, and the erudite and insightful Simon Ings were absolutely brilliant.  As was, as ever, my friend Paul Duffield.  And the digital painter, Ed, whose last name I now forget (for reasons I’ll get into tomorrow, I’m sure), was a revelation – even his unintended marks sparked stories.

Right now, I just want to thank Liam Young, Angelique and MU Gallery for arranging all this and hosting us, and to all the people who showed up and/or listened in on the Ustream.  It was a really entertaining, fascinating way to spend a weekend, and wonderful ideas were conjured, despite the massive drag factor introduced into the mix by my inclusion.

And now, I haven’t had a full night’s sleep in about nine days, so…


On The Road: How The Light Gets In

June 1st, 2012 | daybook, events

So tomorrow I begin the long trek to Hay-On-Wye, for two appearances (Sunday and Monday) at the literary/philosophy festival How The Light Gets In.  All details at link.  I imagine most data traffic from me will be on Instagram and Twitter.  Expect this place to be dark until probably Tuesday night, because I want to escape as much of the Jubilee crap as possible.


When The Internet Deletes Hype

May 29th, 2012 | daybook, researchmaterial

Editor and writer David Hepworth:

You can’t hide. I was talking to somebody in the record business recently who pointed out, rather mournfully, that it was no longer possible to hype people. What he meant was that it was no longer possible to convince them that something was more popular or widely adopted than it actually was. You no longer went into Radio 2 and told them that they should be playing a record because it was going to be popular among this or that demographic. You simply sent them a link to the You Tube page where they could see how many people had streamed the video. Digital is its own audit. This is something magazines are going to have to get used to.

“Digital is its own audit.”  That’s really kind of interesting to me.  I’m used to unique counts being obscured and lied about.  But I hadn’t considered the open-count public services.  And, of course, this is what Likes and RTs and +1s lead to.  A world where we encourage everyone to vote on everything (an element of more than a few sf pieces).

Cultural voting, of course, leads to the triage suggested in the quote: following counts leads inexorably to media that play only the things they already know people like.

Which makes me prize things like Mary Anne Hobbs’ Saturday night show on XFM all the more: because I know that for three hours I will hear things that I have never heard before.

Still.  Interesting point.


Sometimes I Think About Reinstating The Comments System

May 29th, 2012 | daybook

And then, before I get insane enough to do it, something wonderful usually happens to stop me.

Poor Charlie Stross.

Much as any artefact exposed to the maw of a small child eventually becomes soggy and turns brown (after it stops working, if moving parts are involved), I am coming to the conclusion that any comment thread on this blog will, between 100 and 200 comments in, circle around to become a discussion of:

* Space colonization

* Automotive technology

* Things that go fast and explode (rockets, military aircraft)

* Alternative energy (from solar through wind/wave to nuclear)

* Libertarianism (and everything is worse with libertarians)

And then he asks his audience – which is a fair bit larger than mine, these days – if he’s doing anything wrong, and wonders aloud how to develop a new audience of commenters.

283 comments (and counting) later, he’s got people ranting about libertarianism, cheap energy (the second comment!) and whores.  Oh, and “secular modern civilisation.”  I get mentioned a couple of times, in regard to the old Warren Ellis Forum and the Whitechapel board (although the poster missed that I turned the latter over to Si Spurrier last year and neither read nor write there).

Charlie’s been writing at his site for a year more than WEF operated, and four years into WEF we’d pretty much mapped out the memetic genome of the self-selected participants.  There comes a time when a hardcore regular attendance dismays new arrivals – as an American put it to me once, “it’s a bit like, ‘really? High school again?’”  And so, even when Charlie says something there that breaks into mainstream consciousness, his commentariat is unlikely to change much.  Also, they are defending that piece of virtual dirt, because they have made it into a place that is comfortable to them.  Charlie’s place is where they come to talk about rockets and whores, damnit.

Which brings up another thing, and I’m not going to ascribe it to Charlie, who is a nice man, but it’s real – sometimes, your commenters, by which you often mean your audience and your readership, are really fucking annoying, and sometimes you don’t like them.  Which you can’t say.  Who’s going to pick up another book by a writer who says “My readers are awful pieces of shit and I can think of twenty of them, right off the bat, who should be drowned in hot pig blubber”?  Nobody.  “My audience are all complete pissflaps.  Have you read my website comments threads?  Utter inane gibberish.  I would like to train a giant horse to fuck out all their eyes.”  Who’s going to say that? 

I guarantee you that even the sweetest and kindest writer has thought that exact thought more than once in their lives.  And its corollary: “Oh god, my readers are such horrible demented shitbags, what am I doing so wrong that I attract them all to me?”

Just as I know that every writer has dropped the ball at least once and disappointed a reader.  Or exposed themselves as a total prick or a frothing nutter. 

The deep interaction between creator and reader that the internet has brought us is not always healthy for either side, nor does it always – or even often – bring out the best in either side.

So I do this: I have a twitter account where people can talk to me, and I have a website where I post my research material and show off interesting stuff I’ve found and talk about whatever’s in my head on any given day.  I feel like, that way, we get the best sides of each other.

(Speculation. The thing about the open house that comments systems constitute is this: you accept my invitation into my house, and then I get stroppy because I want to know why you’re pissing on the floor and refusing to talk about anything other than that one sculpture on my shelf that depicts a whore riding a rocket.  But just maybe you’re urinating in fear because you only came into the house to look at the sculpture and now I’m trying to fit you into the oven.)

Best of luck, Charlie.

Also, buy a bigger oven.